Chicks in space featuring matts brain on a memory stick
I’m on this whole colonisation of space trip.
My mate’s always going on about how the world is headed for disaster.
Me, I’m pretty confident in technology. The internet is making the global community a reality.
That’s why I hate hippies protesting about GE and nuclear power. Where mature (green) free market societies can rise so GE and nuclear power will not be used by white corporate fucks to fuck poor peoples asses . . . it’ll save our asses.
If we run out of oil we’ll synthesize it with biofeul.
If we run out of water making biofeul we’ll synthesize it with nuclear powered desalinators (y’know so we can water plants with the sea and stuff)
But all those poor people overseas will keep starving! We seriously need more condoms. Thats not a joke.
Things will probably get a bit nasty in our lifetimes, but we’ll get through. And with the advances in genetics . . .
what if people born in the 20th century were the last humans to die? That’d suck!
Then it’s off to space.
You know those ultra feminists how they don’t need men, y’know the "as long as there’s sperm on ice then we’re good without men" types?
Well, I just bummed out.
Boys won’t be going to colonise space. We’ll take up too much room. Way more room than a sperm bank. It’ll just add to the cost and damage to the atmosphere when you launch extra shit into space, in this case, like dudes.
Chicks will colonise space.
See THERE’s a movie I might be interested in watching. Like hot chicks on Saturn and aliens and stuff.
Well I’m still going to space before I die. Look down on the earth. That will be a trip.
Literally. By the time I get to that age I’m going to liberally self medicating. Dying of old age will be considered so 21st century.
But then I’m just going to upload to my brain and like chill. Then email it to the girls out on the moons of Saturn we’re they’ll have grown me a nice clone to download my brain into.
SWEEEEEEET
YES TONIGHT WE’RE GONNA PARTY LIKE ITS TWO THOUSAND AND NINETY NINE!!!!
Saturday, April 12, 2008
Girls and Myspace Surveys
Why do girls do surveys???
I have met some amazing chicks here in my time on myspace.
Intelligent women. Creative women. Beautiful women.
But they just can’t stay away from those dumb surveys where they tell everyone all these boring trivial minute details of their mundane lives!!!
Is it a deep genetic impulse known as the cleo/cosmo reflex?
Not a lot of research is available on the subject.
(ie by googling "why do girls do myspace surveys")
But it has been mooted that chicks are very much into "self discovery" and learning about "who they really are".
See I already know I’m smarter than most people I meet it’s just up to me to make more money and date more models to prove it - oh and of course to present this ultra rationalised shallow facade to the world and see who buys it.
but this bulletin isn’t about that.
It’s about another funny old thing I’ve noticed, I even do it myself.
Look at your comments. Especially your PCs.
Have you noticed how often people say the same thing as others without even thinking?
For example:
One person says "Hey Matt, cool pic, nice hair, blah blah . . . "
the chances that the next people to comment will start with the word "hey", will use the adjective "cool" or mention my "hair" is dramatically increased.
I dunno, maybe people don’t really think that much.
Or they tend to treat their brains as a sponge for soaking things up and squeezing them out, rather than a muscle and working it.
See if you notice what I’m talking about
I have met some amazing chicks here in my time on myspace.
Intelligent women. Creative women. Beautiful women.
But they just can’t stay away from those dumb surveys where they tell everyone all these boring trivial minute details of their mundane lives!!!
Is it a deep genetic impulse known as the cleo/cosmo reflex?
Not a lot of research is available on the subject.
(ie by googling "why do girls do myspace surveys")
But it has been mooted that chicks are very much into "self discovery" and learning about "who they really are".
See I already know I’m smarter than most people I meet it’s just up to me to make more money and date more models to prove it - oh and of course to present this ultra rationalised shallow facade to the world and see who buys it.
but this bulletin isn’t about that.
It’s about another funny old thing I’ve noticed, I even do it myself.
Look at your comments. Especially your PCs.
Have you noticed how often people say the same thing as others without even thinking?
For example:
One person says "Hey Matt, cool pic, nice hair, blah blah . . . "
the chances that the next people to comment will start with the word "hey", will use the adjective "cool" or mention my "hair" is dramatically increased.
I dunno, maybe people don’t really think that much.
Or they tend to treat their brains as a sponge for soaking things up and squeezing them out, rather than a muscle and working it.
See if you notice what I’m talking about
Man and Goat
Man and Goat
oh the questions that remain . . . how did he get caught???
Was it a boy or a girl goat? was the goat underage? Pretty shabby journalism really.
I mean seriously. HOW did he get caught?
Did someone say to the goat . . . "show me on this doll where the man touched you?"
Final name suppression was granted today to a North Canterbury man who admitted trying to have sex with a goat.
In Rangiora District Court, Judge Brian Callaghan ordered the man, who turns 69 tomorrow, to undergo two years of intense supervision.
Judge Callaghan said the behaviour was "unusual, perverse and depraved" but his family, including the man’s wife, continued to support him and publication of his name would negatively affect any chances of his rehabilitation.
"It is unfortunate that cases of this nature, the way things are, attract overwhelming media publicity," the judge said.
"There is no doubt a prurient interest (in the case) that people will want to read about. Unfortunately that is human nature."
He said he believed the man’s wife was "bearing the greatest burden here".
The judge noted the man’s previous sexual offending against pre-pubescent girls more than 20 years ago, which, he said, might explain why he chose an animal to satisfy his sexual urges.
"You are a sad case, really," Judge Callaghan said. "This is such perverse and depraved behaviour it reflects a person of enormous deficiency in personality."
At his earlier appearance the court was told the man believed he would not get caught because "animals couldn’t talk" and he would not be "told on".
He had pleaded guilty then to the charge of attempting to commit bestiality with a goat.
Police said the man admitted taking the goat to the rear of his small lifestyle property in a rural township and trying to have sex with it.
After the unsuccessful attempt, the man did up his trousers, patted the goat and walked off.
"He was contrite but said he was unable to stop the behaviour," the police prosecutor said.
Urging Judge Callaghan to grant final name suppression, lawyer Andrew McCormick said the man had "significant personal problems", was unsophisticated, and as an "untreated sex offender" was at a high risk of reoffending.
When the public became aware of earlier offending against children he’d been "run out of town" and suffered regular beatings.
He’d suffered the "full spotlight of the public" and believed he was a prisoner in his own home, fearful of going out because of public hostility.
The man also suffered from a number of medical conditions, including sexual dysfunction.
"If this man’s identity is before the public, he and his family would become pariahs in the community," Mr McCormick said.
Judge Callaghan noted the maximum penalty for similar offending had been reduced from life imprisonment at the turn of the 20th century to one of 3-1/2 years.
But he said he believed a jail sentence was not warranted despite the "niggling issue of sexual offending against young females over 20 years ago".
oh the questions that remain . . . how did he get caught???
Was it a boy or a girl goat? was the goat underage? Pretty shabby journalism really.
I mean seriously. HOW did he get caught?
Did someone say to the goat . . . "show me on this doll where the man touched you?"
Final name suppression was granted today to a North Canterbury man who admitted trying to have sex with a goat.
In Rangiora District Court, Judge Brian Callaghan ordered the man, who turns 69 tomorrow, to undergo two years of intense supervision.
Judge Callaghan said the behaviour was "unusual, perverse and depraved" but his family, including the man’s wife, continued to support him and publication of his name would negatively affect any chances of his rehabilitation.
"It is unfortunate that cases of this nature, the way things are, attract overwhelming media publicity," the judge said.
"There is no doubt a prurient interest (in the case) that people will want to read about. Unfortunately that is human nature."
He said he believed the man’s wife was "bearing the greatest burden here".
The judge noted the man’s previous sexual offending against pre-pubescent girls more than 20 years ago, which, he said, might explain why he chose an animal to satisfy his sexual urges.
"You are a sad case, really," Judge Callaghan said. "This is such perverse and depraved behaviour it reflects a person of enormous deficiency in personality."
At his earlier appearance the court was told the man believed he would not get caught because "animals couldn’t talk" and he would not be "told on".
He had pleaded guilty then to the charge of attempting to commit bestiality with a goat.
Police said the man admitted taking the goat to the rear of his small lifestyle property in a rural township and trying to have sex with it.
After the unsuccessful attempt, the man did up his trousers, patted the goat and walked off.
"He was contrite but said he was unable to stop the behaviour," the police prosecutor said.
Urging Judge Callaghan to grant final name suppression, lawyer Andrew McCormick said the man had "significant personal problems", was unsophisticated, and as an "untreated sex offender" was at a high risk of reoffending.
When the public became aware of earlier offending against children he’d been "run out of town" and suffered regular beatings.
He’d suffered the "full spotlight of the public" and believed he was a prisoner in his own home, fearful of going out because of public hostility.
The man also suffered from a number of medical conditions, including sexual dysfunction.
"If this man’s identity is before the public, he and his family would become pariahs in the community," Mr McCormick said.
Judge Callaghan noted the maximum penalty for similar offending had been reduced from life imprisonment at the turn of the 20th century to one of 3-1/2 years.
But he said he believed a jail sentence was not warranted despite the "niggling issue of sexual offending against young females over 20 years ago".
Mr. Good Enough
I just LOVE sexual politics. In case you didn’t know.
You really shouldn’t get the wrong idea.
But you can still delete me if you like, I always get sick of stupid people eventually anyway and there are heaps of stupid people on my friends list.
There are some people on my friends list who - if I was a REAL friend - I would tell them to stop using myspace as an excuse to act 15 years old.
But you know what girls are like. The truth is not one of their favourite things.
Did you see that article in the sunday star about settling for mr. good enough?
basically if you’re 30 and an 8, you should accept that you’re an 8 and settle for an 8 husband rather than holding out for a 10 and before you know it 40 and a 5 and settling for a 5 husband.
It’s so calculating isn’t it?
Don’t you just love post-feminism?
so let me get this straight.
When you’re erin brokovich and you’re using your cleavage to save the planet, you’re sexually empowered, but when you’re pushing 40 and losing your looks, you’re best to just take what you can before you die "lonely and childless"?
Or could it be that maybe buying into all this "sexual empowerment" shit is basically setting yourself up for a fall because you chose to define yourself in terms of your sexuality because you have a sweet rack rather than say . . . oh I dunno . . .
your basic essence of goodness as a human being?
I dunno. Men are programmed to want to fuck.
You want to sell something to a guy? Put a hot chick next to it. You’ll see this . . . oh . . . everywhere?
Men are programmed to sexually profile women without even thinking consciously about it.
And that’s the reason guys are into blondes. Only young girls have naturally blonde hair while the boobs are there because men don’t have that greater noses like other animals that can smell when shes keen, so the boobs tell the man that she’s not too young.
And of course on top of tits thats another crazy thing about human females. While other animals go on heat, human females are always keen.
Thats a whole nother story to do with how useless human children are that they need two parents (another reason men are programmed to basically just want to fuck) but anyway.
The boob jobs and the short skirts and the blonde dye jobs . . . is that instinct too?
Or maybe sexual empowerment is just another marketing scam . . .
Not saying there’s anything wrong with marketing!!!!
hahaha
You really shouldn’t get the wrong idea.
But you can still delete me if you like, I always get sick of stupid people eventually anyway and there are heaps of stupid people on my friends list.
There are some people on my friends list who - if I was a REAL friend - I would tell them to stop using myspace as an excuse to act 15 years old.
But you know what girls are like. The truth is not one of their favourite things.
Did you see that article in the sunday star about settling for mr. good enough?
basically if you’re 30 and an 8, you should accept that you’re an 8 and settle for an 8 husband rather than holding out for a 10 and before you know it 40 and a 5 and settling for a 5 husband.
It’s so calculating isn’t it?
Don’t you just love post-feminism?
so let me get this straight.
When you’re erin brokovich and you’re using your cleavage to save the planet, you’re sexually empowered, but when you’re pushing 40 and losing your looks, you’re best to just take what you can before you die "lonely and childless"?
Or could it be that maybe buying into all this "sexual empowerment" shit is basically setting yourself up for a fall because you chose to define yourself in terms of your sexuality because you have a sweet rack rather than say . . . oh I dunno . . .
your basic essence of goodness as a human being?
I dunno. Men are programmed to want to fuck.
You want to sell something to a guy? Put a hot chick next to it. You’ll see this . . . oh . . . everywhere?
Men are programmed to sexually profile women without even thinking consciously about it.
And that’s the reason guys are into blondes. Only young girls have naturally blonde hair while the boobs are there because men don’t have that greater noses like other animals that can smell when shes keen, so the boobs tell the man that she’s not too young.
And of course on top of tits thats another crazy thing about human females. While other animals go on heat, human females are always keen.
Thats a whole nother story to do with how useless human children are that they need two parents (another reason men are programmed to basically just want to fuck) but anyway.
The boob jobs and the short skirts and the blonde dye jobs . . . is that instinct too?
Or maybe sexual empowerment is just another marketing scam . . .
Not saying there’s anything wrong with marketing!!!!
hahaha
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)